The EPA says it intends to regulate aircraft emissions as a pollution harmful to human health. The proposal seems to arise from the environmentally friendly part of the agency. Other elements in that department are complicit with the status quo overseen by the U.S. government. And that status quo involves the dumping of millions of tons of aerosol particulate into the air to alter the planet’s weather, ostensibly in the war against global warming. Sky striping is pollution emitted as a policy of national security with no regard to human health. EPA says jet exhaust comprises 3 percent of greenhouse gas pollution.
By David Tulis
May 20, 2015, New London, Conn. — President Obama gives a lecture today to coast guard cadets that gives the official line about “climate change” and a peek into the rationale behind the government’s continuing weather modification efforts.
Mr. Obama gives an alarming analysis, taking sides as the whether global climate is warming or cooling. He votes for warming, and says that his listeners ought to feel a rising sense of alarm at weather data.
“I’m here today to say that climate change constitutes a serious threat to global security, an immediate risk to our national security. And make no mistake, it will impact how our military defends our country. And so we need to act — and we need to act now.”
Outside the scope of Mr. Obama’s speech, the U.S. government is undertaking twin agendas: A massive program of artificial cloud creation as rhythmic as bouts afflicting a migraine sufferer, and a gathering up of academic support proposing an official pollution program to cool earth’s surface by enhanced cloud cover. The national academy of sciences in February published a book, Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth, weighing a global program for official aerosol pollution intended to dim sunlight. The report scoffs at environmentalists who say the program is well under way, ruins human health and creates extreme weather all on its own.
Mr. Obama says the U.S. government is giving global “leadership” in promoting weather as a crisis requiring drastic state-sponsored action.
When you’re on deck, standing your watch, you stay vigilant. You plan for every contingency. And if you see storm clouds gathering, or dangerous shoals ahead, you don’t sit back and do nothing. You take action — to protect your ship, to keep your crew safe. Anything less is negligence. It is a dereliction of duty. And so, too, with climate change. Denying it, or refusing to deal with it endangers our national security. It undermines the readiness of our forces.
Americans must be “realists” and avoid wishful thinking that sets humanity “on a course for disaster.” Because the globe is warming and sea levels rising, “confronting climate change is now a key pillar of American global leadership. When I meet with leaders around the world, it’s often at the top of our agenda — a core element of our diplomacy.”
Everybody agrees: ‘Climate change happening’
In talking past his cadet audience, Mr. Obama says climate change is an indisputable phenomenon. “The best scientists in the world know that climate change is happening. Our analysts in the intelligence community know climate change is happening. Our military leaders — generals and admirals, active duty and retired — know it’s happening. Our homeland security professionals know it is happening. And our Coast Guard knows it’s happening. The science is indisputable.”
Mr. Obama blames carbon dioxide, an essential ingredient in photosynthesis and an ingredient of human exhalation, for growing global temps. Glaciers are melting and a 1- to 4-foot rise in sea levels will devastate coastal areas globally. “Already, today, in Miami and Charleston, streets now flood at high tide,” he says. “Along our coasts, thousands of miles of highways and roads, railways, energy facilities are all vulnerable. It’s estimated that a further increase in sea level of just one foot by the end of this century could cost our nation $200 billion.”
Weather conditions, he says, promise to bring “instability and conflict” around the globe. Nigeria’s drought was “exploited by the terrorist group Boko Haram.” A Philippine typhoon, Haiyan, “gave us a possible glimpse of things to come — one of the worst cyclones ever recorded; thousands killed, many more displaced, billions of dollars in damage, and a massive international relief effort that included the United States military and its Coast Guard.” Climate extremes will create “climate refugees” and “create the potential for mass migrations and new tensions. All of which is why the Pentagon calls climate change a ‘threat multiplier.’”
Aerial intervention — unmentioned factor
Mr. Obama in his speech seems excited about the possibilities of the climate crisis. It gives the U.S. opportunity for leadership, grants it occasion to extend military and humanitarian controls globally, and authorizes emergency measures, as crisis is the mother of intervention. His speech excites an expectation of bold federal action, some of which might involve young cadets. As if the public were exhausted at the prospect of yet another federal salvation, the climate change crisis beckons and gives occasion for Washington to prove its keep. At stake now is just a class of dolers or a section of the financial industry or a union donor base, but the entire human race, the very planet.
Oddly, Mr. Obama mentions no emergency measures equal to the crisis he describes. For all his heightened talk about the crisis, the response is earthbound, technical. He touts fuel-efficient cars, research into renewables, more fuel efficient coast guard cutters. “The Air Force F-22 broke the sound barrier using biofuels. And the Navy runs an entire carrier strike group — the Green Fleet — with biofuels. Our Marines have deployed to Afghanistan with portable solar panels, lightening their load and reducing dangerous resupply missions.”
Mr. Obama praises pollution-cutting regulations from EPA and takes credit for reduced air pollution from industry. Americans have cut emissions more than any other people, he says. “[W]e can be proud that our carbon pollution is near its lowest levels in almost two decades. *** I’ve committed to doubling the pace at which we cut carbon pollution.”
A global military emergency exists. Yet all solutions in the speech are small-bore. A global catastrophe is afoot, and he proudly brings up the Marines’ use of solar panels in Afghanistan and energy research in U.S. labs and universities.
The gap between the magnificent environmental crisis and what he offers as responses is filled by a mystery. That mystery reasonably is skirted by the 16 scientists at national academy of sciences who speak of aerosol injections in the atmosphere as theoretical concepts that are still on the runway, and lead readers to believe no effort at weather modification has ever been tried.
Weather modification is the solution Mr. Obama modestly overlooks. It may be more apt to say that “solar radiation management” is the solution he judiciously overlooks, as the program is largely behind the veil of national security. Though sky striping is remarkable for visual evidence it leaves overhead or stretching from horizon-to-horizon, it remains a state secret. Ingredients of fuels are secret, and the operation of the government’s worn-out fleet of stratotankers is secret, according to researcher Jim Lee of Climateviewer.com.
Environmentalists such as Dane Wigington cite anthropogenic causes for climate heating yet also argue that the creation of artificial clouds by policy is worsening global temperatures, and go so far as to suggest that a climate crisis itself is a policy, that climate disasters, droughts, storms and quakes are deep state operation in which state actors seek private gain using inside information and the apparatus of the U.S. air force to affect significant weather events with private advantate.
Across the country bizarre weather is becoming common. East Tennessee was hit by a freak hailstorm June 2, 2015 (see video clips below). California is subject to its fourth year of drought and satellite images online show sky stripe interventions against the jetstream bringing rainfall. Snow falls on deserts and in Europe storms dump a dozen feet of snow.
On March 25, 2014, a freak blizzard struck downtown Chattanooga a day after a jet plumes cross-stitched the skies over Hamilton County. A Feb. 14, 2014, storm dumped 9 inches of “heavy wet snow” on Chattanooga that had mostly melted by evening of the next day, perhaps an artificially nucleated snow. Such a weather novelty hit the western plains Oct. 4 and 5 in 2013, killing 100,000 head of cattle in an event that could only have been created by chemical interaction in near-40 degree days.
Aerial interventions well discussed in the scientific literature are in scientifically advanced states, though the U.S. government pretends no such program has been developed. In Mr. Obama’s speech, the gap between the crisis he describes on one end and the paltry responses on the other is less a gap than it appears. If you squint, you see a skein of tens of thousands of white tendrils connecting the two, those milky white plumes emitted by a powerful program of a too-modest national government to alter the weather and shape national destinies.
Sources: Mr. Obama’s speech, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/05/20/remarks-president-united-states-coast-guard-academy-commencement