Do chief, sheriff care about officers? If ‘yes,’ traffic stop limits must be policy

print

Heavily armed and armored Chattanooga police officers munch on breakfast at Tienda Quetzal restaurant as part of a “get to know your officer” front porch lineup. (Photo CPD on Facebook)

The men and women who serve in police departments and sheriff’s departments in southeast Tennessee have their necks on the line.

Will their bosses realize the new legal exposure that these oath-bound people face in service to city or county when they enforce the state transportation code at Tenn. Code Ann. § Title 55?

By David Tulis / 92.7 NoogaRadio

The threat is in the form of an informed citizenry whose men and women are unwilling to accept abusive treatment along the roads and highways of Tennessee as they have for years, without apparent remedy.

Today these people have in their arsenals of liberty a new weapon against abusive and illegal policing. The danger to the officer today is that a routine traffic stop, in legal terms, may be an act of oppression under the Tennessee oppression statute or under common law tort or nuisance.

That means that a traffic stop, once a routine service for public safety, may now recoil and bite the officer because it is a violation of the law, an actionable and oppressive deed.

‘Notice’ arrives on scene

The danger is relatively new, thanks to the arrival of a liberating document called transportation administrative notice, which I have prepared and published broadly (online and as a member of the press on radio) and also published narrowly (personal delivery to government entities subject to constitutional government and statute).

TAN make a distinction between travel and transportation, and shows plainly that under Tennessee statute, the officer has authority for a transportation stop only if the person behind the wheel of the stopped car or truck is involved in transportation.

If that person is a private user, and not involved in transportation, he is not liable for performance under the main rules for statutory construction.

TAN, a bright light in a murky area of law that rarely lawyers read, seeks to weed out from the employment list those officers and deputies who are acting as sovereign individuals, acting under color of law, and without warrant, against an innocent person, depriving that person of his constitutionally guaranteed rights of property in free movement, which is also understood to be “communication.” This officer, once his department has been notified, is legally liable to his victim.

Thanks to the notice to his employer, the officer can no longer claim his main defense of years past — that of intentionality and knowledge. The officer cannot say “I didn’t intend to hurt this person’s free exercise of the right of travel as recognized in statute and constitution,” nor can he say, “didn’t know he had such a right under the law, and I didn’t know that there is such a thing as a traveler; I assumed everyone was a driver or operator.”

What have police chiefs told officers?

It will be shown, as a matter of law, that he and his superiors acted in bad faith in not enforcing the statute along its lawful track, but slopped over into the area of free and private human activity on the people’s roads.

The matter of concern here is for the individual man or woman who is at the street level. Is he being told about the notice? Does he know that his department has been notified about the distinction in the statue between transportation and travel? Have his superiors made a good-faith effort to obey the law? Have they made a good-faith effort to reduce their activities pursuant to the law? Did the department obtain legal advice about the law to confirm that the notice is, indeed, making true claims about Tenn. Code Ann. § Title 55 and U.S. Code 49?

Who are the travelers?

If his employer does not take heed of the notice, the deputy is entirely exposed, and unless he is media savvy and pays attention to what happens to the digital world, he will be blindsided by the lawsuit that will come against him in his personal capacity when he arrests and jails a free traveler, exercising his rights.

There are many travelers on the roads today. Probably half of the Immigrant population is on the road without a driver license. They are exercising their rights to travel in the American system of law and. Many black people also do not have driver licenses, nor insurance nor other proofs of commercial activity. This figure of “half of African-Americans” is based on many inquiries among black residents of Chattanooga. Many of them have licenses that are suspended, revoked or expired, Keelah Jackson and Cameron Williams among them.

Transportation Administrative Notice creates new cause of action vs. cop

There’s no harm, I believe, if they travel the roads on a revoked license IF they are not involved in for-hire activity, called in the case law an extraordinary use of the people’s roads. I would not advise them to do that, as my idea is to always obey every law that applies to you. But if a person has a revoked license and simply finds it necessary to travel in a car or truck, this person has a defense under administrative notice.

He tells the officers, “Sir, I am traveling under transportation administrative notice, and I make no statement, and maintain all my fourth amendment rights, and hereby assert them.”

So as transportation administrative notice becomes more widely known, a larger percentage of the population of people on the road will be aware that they can defend their movement thereon without exercising a taxable state privilege under the purview of the uniform administrative procedures act.

Taking local responsibility amid legal disjointure

Will chiefs and sheriffs think personally about their longtime staff people? Will they regard their families, their estates, their lands and houses, and the furnishings and savings of these men and women? Will they take a personal interest in the future prosperity of their employees’ children and grandchildren?

Will these high officials and law enforcement recognize that they have to act in the direction of reform because no top-down solution will come in this abuse practiced everywhere and assumed by virtually everyone in the state as normative, legal and “just the way things are.”

An activist judiciary in Tennessee has created a disjointure between policy and law. The policy is close enough to the extortion statute in state law as to constitute extortion, I suspect. Current traffic stop enforcement statewide is custom, not law, and if it violates a law, it is a potential crime.

The lawyers guild allows the states to prey upon the citizenry. That guild contains lawyers on the pleading and brief-filing side, and those who sit in black robes and who control juries and decide cases. The bar as a whole is enfused with cash from the raid by the police state against the people within its borders. The state is at war with a free traveling public, and pretends that no right of communication by movement exits.

Will chiefs of police such as David Roddy in Chattanooga, Robert Simpson in Red Bank, J.R. Reed in East Ridge, Sheriff Jim Hammond of Hamilton County respect their fellow officers and apprise them of the slight change in the legal landscape that affects their purses and well-being? Do they care? Or is their allegiance tied up elsewhere, in fantasies about policing and in a wish to protect a deep state status quo?

TAN is a lococentric reform that starts in a single city, town or county and will eventually spread across the state. As I have described elsewhere, it creates a sanctuary city whenever the mayor decides to quit disobeying the law.

Support this blog and vote for my 1 p.m. weekday show on 92.7 NoogaRadio by going to GoFundMe and making a free gift. I am grateful for your interest in my ministry and your support of my effort to bring godly reform and constitutional obedience in Chattanooga, Hamilton County and places beyond by being a member of the free press.

Without traffic stop reform, human flourishing in Tennessee will suffer

Modern state works to make private people public people — commercial legal entities

Police powers notice to fight for place in county records

Why charged ‘driving on revoked’? Dred Scott tells of roadway slavery

Notice project exploits fissure between law, TN policy, creates cause of action

Judge, clerks refuse ‘client’ restricted license, offer costly path for regular one

Journalist-teacher fights for driver license as system gridlocks on poor

How state snips quills of constitutional rights, manhandles ‘free’ people

Tires, engine, steering wheel do not motor vehicle make

Where does state get standing to prosecute you in criminal case?

Sun shines over Red Bank; city attorney refuses to admit TAN

Berke cops reject constitutional rule to Mirandize all arrestees

Chatty Wagon should insist: Not in ‘transportation’

Go to hell, judges tell Hispanics, others seeking to use TN roads freely

Does Pinkston have moral authority to enforce Title 55?

Cops pile 8 charges on Mrs. Watt in hair-raising traffic stop

 

Cabbies, haulers subject to state control; what about you, private user?

Cops drag woman out of car under commercial transportation law

Title 55 charge puts young woman to tears

The orphaned right: How states squelched Americans’ right to travel

State troopers take private sector by storm, bully travelers into commerce

Judge halts TN’s driver license abuse, but keeps deep state scheme alive

City puts officers’ necks on line if it doesn’t revise traffic stop procedure

Officers with plenty of cover kill woman in car trapped in woods

Ledford pushes back against open city idea that would result from Title 55 obedience

Pinkston prosecutorial practice: ‘No constitutional “right to travel,”’ & that’s that

Citizens to city council: Routine arrests ugly, hateful

City’s poor get relief, cops avoid liability suits — fruits of administrative notice

If licensing scheme runs on consent, ‘illegals’ may be freer than citizens

Bid to uncover harassment on state highways stonewalled

Double whammy: Hirsch rips gun law, says cops act outside law in traffic cases

New Question Police Should Ask at Traffic Stop

Helton Orders Tulis to ‘Sit Down’ in Traffic Case

Traffic court misuses statute, bullies poor people, upholds fiction about ‘transportation’

Small towns, big cities should mind limits of Title 55: Only transportation subject to cop controls

Escapees kill 2 ’drivers’; but apps help others on road turn profit

Local economy & its enemies: Absolutism of administrative law

Double-nickel police reform enjoys major political constituencies

Traffic controls rip poor, violate travelers’ rights, Hirsch says

Oppressed ‘Fiddle Man of Lawrenceburg’ pleads with sheriff to obey law

How Tennesseans could throw off shackles of police state imposed on highways

Hirsch case hints how state makes bizarre legal gyration to make itself god

7 reasons mayors, sheriffs will refuse adding single question to traffic arrest protocol

Swayed by envy, 12 on jury convict Hirsch of trying to live as free man

How Berke could win all sides by restraining cops, ordering ’open’ city

U.S. judge urged ‘notice’ openness in TN law to free movement, travel by car

‘Fiddle man’ vows appeal after jury rejects constitutional protections

Taxi board oversees transportation, no authority over private travel

What I tell appellate judge McClarty about slave days, use of roads

Berke would make enemies if takes tough action over roadside abuses

Pinkston gets copy of administrative notice; will officers be notified?

Journalist gives city administrative notice on limits to police power

Transportation administrative notice Tennessee

Improving prod upon officials — the idea of administrative notice

Improving prod upon officials — the idea of administrative notice

Administrative notice tells city its authority is limited

Notice to Haslam: Staff personally liable if not fix traffic stop rules

 

Driver license racket operates in realm of administrative law

Notice to Hammond: Reform required even though Haslam, judges, legislators opposed

U.S. judge slams Haslam’s abuse of driver license revocations to enslave, impoverish poor

It’s time DA Pinkston squints at TN traffic law, observes limited scope

City urged restrain cops, obey TN traffic law, avoid abusing minorities

Hammond mulls 7 questions on travel right, transportation privilege

City claims authority to regulate vehicles for hire

Cops stop truck transporting explosives without permits, placards

Administrative notice warns East Ridge about limits of arrest power over travelers

Paying penny a day, people yield rights, avoid the accuser

Citizens appear to reject ‘double nickel’ police stop reform

Yearly emissions test reminds of state’s conversion of right into privilege

If we were a free people, who would pay?

Free-range motorist seeks to vaporize charges, asks they be heard ‘in agency’

One Response

  1. John Ballinger October 5, 2018 Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.